THE CHALLENGECertification Is Where Good Devices Get Stuck
In India a vehicle tracking device cannot ship without AIS 140 type approval from a body like ARAI or ICAT, and the test campaign is unforgiving. A radiated emission a few decibels over the limit, an ESD strike that resets the device, or a documentation gap can each send you back for a respin and another booking weeks out. The cost of failing the formal test is measured in months and tooling, beyond the lab fees alone. The device is designed to pass before it ever reaches the lab, pre-compliance catches the problems early, and the documentation is prepared so the certification campaign goes through cleanly.
A component of the broader GPS tracking device engineering capability, often deployed with AIS 140 and NavIC Compliance.
WHEN YOU NEED THIS
When Approval Is the Gate to Market
You need certification support when a device legally cannot ship without type approval, when a previous attempt failed at the lab, or when you want to design for certification up front instead of discovering the problems at the end.
AIS 140 VLTD Devices
Vehicle location tracking devices for the Indian market that need AIS 140 type approval before they can be fitted to commercial and public transport vehicles.
Devices That Failed the Lab
Products that came back from ARAI or ICAT with an EMC, ESD, or functional failure, where the root cause is diagnosed and the design fixed before the re-test.
Design-Stage Projects
New trackers still in design, where building in EMC, ESD, and documentation discipline early avoids a painful and expensive scramble at certification.
SCOPE OF WORK
What's Included
AIS 140 Certification Path
The full AIS 140 path is mapped for your device: the functional requirements for the VLTD, the emergency button and NavIC support, the tests the standard calls for, and the sequence of submissions to ARAI or ICAT, so you know what the campaign looks like before you commit to it.
EMC and EMI Pre-Compliance
Radiated and conducted emission and immunity pre-compliance is run so problems surface on the bench, not at the formal lab. Where a device is over a limit, the fix is made at the source with filtering, shielding, and layout changes rather than chased with band-aids.
ESD and Transient Protection
ESD and transient protection is designed so the device survives the contact and air discharge tests and the load-dump and transient conditions of a vehicle electrical system, with TVS protection and grounding worked into the layout from the start.
Type-Approval Documentation
The technical documentation the certification body requires is prepared: the test plan, device description, declarations, and the records that support the submission, so the paperwork does not become the thing that holds up approval.
TECHNICAL APPROACH
How Approval Is Passed the First Time
The cheapest place to fix a compliance problem is the schematic, the most expensive is a failed formal test, so the work is shifted as early as possible and the lab visit is treated as confirmation rather than discovery.
Design for Certification
EMC and ESD design is built in from the schematic and layout stage: clean grounding, filtering on every interface that leaves the board, controlled return paths, and protection on connectors, so the device is built to pass rather than patched to pass.
Catch It in Pre-Compliance
Emissions are measured and immunity and ESD checks are run on the bench so a marginal result is found and fixed weeks before the formal booking, when a fix is a layout change and not a respin under time pressure.
Walk Through the Lab
The device and the documentation are prepared for ARAI or ICAT and the campaign is supported, and when a test does flag something the root cause is diagnosed and closed out, so the certification finishes rather than stalls.
INTEGRATION AND OUTPUTS
What You Get Back
The certification work lands as pre-compliance data, design fixes that close the gaps, and a documentation pack that takes the device through type approval and on to market.
A Device Ready for the Lab
A device that has passed pre-compliance with margin and the fixes already in the design, so the formal ARAI or ICAT campaign is a confirmation step rather than a gamble.
A Complete Submission Pack
The test plan, declarations, and technical documentation the certification body asks for, so the submission is complete and the approval is not held up by a missing record.
FAQ
Common Questions
What is the difference between ARAI and ICAT?
ARAI and ICAT are both designated Indian testing and certification agencies authorized to grant type approval for automotive devices, including AIS 140 vehicle tracking devices. They run comparable test campaigns against the same standards, and the choice between them usually comes down to scheduling, location, and prior relationship. The device and documentation can be prepared to suit whichever agency you work with.
Why run pre-compliance instead of just booking the lab?
Because a formal test slot is expensive and booked weeks out, and a failure there sends you back for a respin and another wait. Pre-compliance on a lab bench finds the marginal emission, immunity, or ESD problem early, when the fix is a filter or a layout change rather than a tooling change under deadline. It turns the formal test into a confirmation rather than a discovery.
Can you fix a device that already failed certification?
Yes. The lab report is used to reproduce the failure on the bench and trace it to the root cause, whether that is a radiated emission, an ESD reset, or a functional gap against the standard. The affected part is then redesigned with margin and pre-compliance is re-run before the device goes back, so the re-test passes.
Need to Pass Certification the First Time?
Share your device and your target approval to get a tailored AIS 140 path, pre-compliance plan, and documentation so the ARAI or ICAT campaign goes through cleanly.
Schedule a Free Consultation